Monday 20 June 2016

Terrorism, extremism, right wing...not new.



I have never met the late Jo Cox MP, www.jocox.org.uk/  grievously murdered Thursday 16th June. So whilst her death is personal to her dear family and friends, it should also mean much to those of us who did not know her. 

I am so sickened by the current rhetoric that attends politics, politicians, and the febrile atmosphere surrounding political activities, from formal institutions to the local.  We cannot deny that this is aided and abetted by press, media and social media too. The lies, the innuendos, the blame, the threats, and the labelling;  for, against, pro, anti. It is only natural that there are ‘differences’ in politics, between politicians, and those  enthused by the democratic process, but  as Jo Cox said in her maiden speech…more united and have far more in common with each other than the things that divides us.

That terror was brought to the street outside a library cannot be denied.  But we have to also acknowledge that ‘labelling’ hypes up situations; primarily, I am thinking of the words ‘terrorists  extremists’, and that which is almost the norm now…to see those tied to ‘Islam’ and ‘Muslim’  But even now, the words ‘refugees’, ‘migrants’ appear as negatives to many. 

So what does it say of our society that in 2016 we can see a billboard poster with snaking queues of people, with the clear purpose of identifying them as  ‘different’ and  'other' ; that they’re going to come here to swamp us. This is not new to Britain. What was the political slogan, Smethwick, 1964?   
The Conservatives were widely reported as using the slogan "if you want a nxxxxr for a neighbour, vote Labour. I suppose I should point out the Tory party rejected the claim saying that this was the work of far right extremists
But it was out  there. Right wing extremism, racist.  
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Griffiths

All this wordage feeds division, forcing us into ‘camps’ that are feared, loathed, despised and on occasion, those who have been labelled into 'camps' are hunted down.
But if we spotlight one and not the other, we do society a dis-service.  

We cannot afford to maintain a ‘head in the sand stance.’ We have to call out right wing terror and terrorism wherever we find it, or where it finds us. And it found Jo Cox without doubt. 
It would appear now that her assailant will face the judge under terrorism protocols. In very sad times for her family and friends, and us all, there could have been no other call.

We cannot continue to imagine that as a society we are immune to this form of terrorism, or that it is exclusive to other areas in the world. Or are we denying the rise and actions of the far right in mainland Europe and beyond? We have seen the demonising of ‘others’ through words, headlines and now posters to a level that should neither continue to be ignored nor go unchallenged.

Here in Scotland perhaps we can view public services in a different light, but whilst what is achieved here might or might not be the optimum, it is achieved in the context of being part of the UK union. 
Cut backs, increasing poverty in the guise of ‘living within your means’, disguising enforced austerity as some form of growth for the future does not make for a safe/safer society. 

But the UK has seen vocabulary, front page headlines, even cartoons, escalate to levels where migrants are blamed for low wages. But we all know that employers set wage rates, not the workers. Migrants are blamed for a lack of access to hospitals, doctors, dentists, but we all know that the NHS requires investment, not cut backs. Migrants are blamed for over-crowded schools but we know that without a programme of school building and teacher training there will be little or no change.

Have we learnt nothing from old Europe, disunited Europe of the 20th century? 
The politics then, the same scape-goating,  billboards,  posters,  flag waving, the and  the ultimate conditioning of people to see, and for a while, accept the unacceptable: the move from despising the ‘other’ to the killing of the ‘other’. 
Today's National www.thenational.scot again pin points fault lines in the EU debate and the reasons for #Remain, not lest right wing extremism and its impact here and abroad that could well continue to escalate if we are out of the EU, with negative economic and political change at Westminster. Dave or Boris? Boris or Dave?

Terror and terrorism struck down a public figure, an MP; someone who choose to enter politics, public life, someone that was put into public life by voters, the likes of you and me.
Will I be able to go down the road, locally, to meet with the person that was willing to take up political office, my MP?   
Will that easy access, on the streets, at the Gala day, in the constituency office continue? 
I hope so, and from what I have heard and seen, it will.

Otherwise, one part of our democratic process died Thursday 16, along with 
Jo Cox...................R I P ...............and all those others murdered for their beliefs, their ethnicity...just for being themselves......


Friday 17 June 2016

Reflections on moving into political, public life…..



Women for Independence /WFI/ published my blog, Sunday 12th June. I had no idea how women in public life, and specifically, politics would feature by the end of the week....


.............So particularly for Jo Cox but for  all women everywhere..........


Image result for jo cox mpRelated image 




Reflections on moving into political, public life…..

What a day, at our National Council meeting in the Inchgarth Community Centre


Aberdeen. A real honour for me to chair yesterday, but with all those #audacious women in the hall, the debates around the EU, information on the Bay of Nigg Campaign, TTIP and enthusing more women into public life, the day passed too quickly with the sure knowledge that the debates would continue long past our all leaving.

We heard from Gillian Martin, just one of the new intake MSPs, her experiences in campaigning and listening to the subsequent discussions,  

..............I  look forward to seeing other brave women make the move into public life. I no longer belong to any political party and have no desire to enter politics. But having listened to WFI discussion at local, EdinWFI, National Committee and National Council level, I have great admiration for those who have made that leap or plan to do so................

In Scotland, we introduced a system of proportional representation with single transferable voting (PR STV) in 2007. As part of the lead up to this ‘innovation’, various advocates for change argued this would renew local politics and at the same time provide new opportunities for women to be selected and elected. To be honest, I can’t find any great evidence of sustained programmes and initiatives and to bring this (‘new opportunities’) about.

By dint of (some) research I’ve found that the 2012 Scottish local authority elections saw 297 (24.3%) women elected as councillors. It would appear then that there is (still) a higher number of older, (aged 50+ ) councillors, and more men than women. I’ve also discovered that in Scottish local government the vast majority (93.75%) of council leaders are male according to COSLA, 2013. 

 

But to play devil’s advocate, does this lack of female politicians at this local level matter? (Yes!) Do we need role models? (Yes!) So, do we need more women standing in 2017? YES!  

And listening yesterday to the input, we had a frank discussion around some of the barriers that hold women back in their pursuit of that local political life.

Financial: That same 2007 change brought about the introduction of a councillors ‘wage’, in the region of £16,000.00. Most councillors would tell us it’s a full time job, so for some that’s a very good salary. But if you are in employment, would you be taking a ‘hit’? Might your new role bring about life/home changes that require you to expend more financially on home/family matters in the first instance.

Then, there’s ‘experience’.  Just what is experience? Do you have to be ‘experienced’ and do you have to be ‘political’ to be a politician? We’re all ‘political’ in our own way. Use public transport? That’s political. Many of us will have been through some or all of the educational system, or have children, grandchildren in the system. That’s political. Using your doctor’s surgery, the dentist, the hospital: it’s all political. So we will have some experience of using local services, and possibly contributing at various levels. Look at the volunteering work we do. But think of us, WFI women. All of our campaigns, the engagement, the leafletting, the door knocking, it’s all political and it’s all experience

Since I don’t belong to a political party, I don’t know about their structures: are they entrenched, male, pale and hierarchical? Or are there mechanisms designed to support, nurture and promote? Do parties have training programmes for women and men considering the move into public politics? Or is it sink or swim in the soup of meetings, with subtle nuances that ‘newbies’ find difficult to negotiate? And how long do you have to stay a ‘newbie’?  Sadly yesterday showed again that there are still current examples within parties of old style power bases, sexism and cliques.

.................We heard directly about the women hating, women baiting, women sniping we see when sisters put their head above the parapet in various forms of public life? Social media and the media in general has such a lot to answer for, How often do we sigh, cry, weep, and yes, fear, as the bad, the very bad, the threats, the criminal, outweighs the good?......................

In all of this maelstrom I believe there is a role for those of us on the side lines. When we know a sister needs support, no matter her party, her affiliations, let’s find ways of providing that support. Within all that which we know and see, it’s also good to remember it’s structures, systems, processes, sexism, conditioning (to name but some)  that needs challenged, called out, and changed. Our experiences, our talents, our strengths, our gifts are there, and outweigh the downsides.

But what might be practical support? Courses? In what, where? How ‘local’ would any ‘courses/sessions’ need to be? What length: a few hours, Longer, day time, evening, weekend? Or perhaps internet sessions: chat rooms, seminars, sharing experiences, coping mechanisms. What of shadowing, amd mentoring, and not just confined to the immediate political arena, but across various sectors? After all, all experiences should be used to best advantage, no matter the setting.  
..........At the beginning then, I used the words ‘brave’ and ‘admiration’ deliberately. I think you are brave and have nothing but admiration for you...............


You decide to make that leap, and let us make every effort to support you where and when we can, where and when you need us. It’s what we all need to do, if we truly want to do politics differently. 


Gillian Martin MSP http://www.parliament.scot/

 WFI Logo Edinburgh.jpg